No other Asian country has
contributed more resources to improving its image than China. The rising power
has recently been operating on a two-year cycle of hosting major events: the
Beijing Olympics in 2008, EXPO 2010 in Shanghai along the Huangpu River, and
the Miss World competition in 2012. Consequently, China is looking to be the
site of the Youth Olympic Games, hoping to attract global attention and tourist
traffic. Despite all its efforts, this method of public diplomacy in
conjunction with the other strategies China has employed is not entirely
successful.
In measuring the effectiveness of
China’s public diplomacy endeavors, one must first identify the country’s target
audience. It seems that China’s main goal is to spread its values and influence
around the world and more specifically the West. In 2004, the Confucius
Institute was founded in 93 countries to promote the worldwide study of Chinese
language and culture. China is also trying to break into the international news
market by broadcasting China Central Television in five languages. Several
Chinese papers, such as, China Daily,
People’s Daily, Global Times, and Shanghai
Daily, have begun circulating in English with hopes of competing with
Western news media. Unfortunately, little interest has been shown by the target
audience.
The majority of the Westerners that
China is trying to reach fall between the range of sixteen to thirty-five years
of age. Yet the mediums of communication, such as television news stations and
newspapers, China is utilizing do not appeal to this age group. Today most
young people get their news the internet and social media, not television or
newspapers. However, China’s stringent monitoring of the internet blocks many
of the most popular social media outlets and websites like Facebook, Twitter,
and Youtube. This directly contradicts China’s goal of reaching the young
people of Western countries who are or one day will be in the position to
influence government and business organizations. Furthermore, because the
content of these publications is largely influenced by the Central Committee of
the Communist Party of China and lacks freedom of speech, the audience tends to
find the information provided to be untrustworthy. Much of the news presented
by Chinese media outlets intended for Western consumption only highlight
positive aspects of China, and viewers see the material as being propagandistic.
If China truly wishes to reach its audience in Western countries, then it will have to look at the successes of other more subtle policies, like its "panda diplomacy". In order to ease the tensions after the high-profile arrest of an Australian business executive of a mining corporation, China sent the pandas Wang Wang and Funi to visit the Adelaide Zoo. In 2011, pandas were also leased to the Smithsonian's National Zoo in the United States. These acts alone harnessed more good will for China than previous efforts of public diplomacy. If China can harness the sincerity of its more successful diplomatic attempts and applies it to all of its endeavors, then China will be closer to achieving its diplomatic goal of Western recognition.
This is the article I used: http://thediplomat.com/2013/12/beijings-public-diplomacy-challenge/?allpages=yes
I totally agree with your argument that China is one of the most enthusiastic countries about Public Diplomacy, especially about cultural diplomacy and exchange diplomacy.
ReplyDeleteI also agree with the idea that China’s governmental information control is contradictory to China’s final goal.
I would argue that not only contradictions between Chinese goal of public diplomacy and information control but also inconsistency with relationship between China and Japan can be raised.
About Japanese Prime Minister Abe’s visiting Yasukuni Shrine, where Class-A war criminals was worshiped (From Japanese aspect, this term “worship” absolutely does not mean affirming Class-A war criminals as heroes of Japan.) China strongly aggressively criticizes that Japan will make a same mistake that was created before.
There was a report that many diplomats of other countries criticized China’s blame on Japan in various places, according to Japanese Ambassador to the United Nations Mr. Yoshikawa. Mr. Yoshikawa told Japanese presses that diplomats of other countries were disappointed by China because of its crude behavior toward Japan.
Although it is obvious that Mr. Abe’s action was to be blamed by the world because it seemed Japan did not care about history of war and its victims and it deteriorated relationship between other East Asian countries, China’s reputation might be dropping if China continues to aggressively blame Japan, which results in less effective Chinese public diplomacy.
News Article that I mentioned:
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/01/30/national/east-asia-tensions-on-display-at-u-n-security-council/#.UvAIHnfAlSu
http://english.kyodonews.jp/news/2014/01/267675.html
commented by Shuri Okamoto