Monday, March 24, 2014

Are Switzerland's Anti-Immigration Policies Ruining Its Brand?


On 9 February, a referendum was held in Switzerland regarding the implementation of immigration quotas. By a close margin, 50.3% of the Swiss population voted to limit the number of immigrants allowed into the country, and therefore, break agreements with the European Union regarding free movement of EU citizens. Switzerland and the EU will now have to negotiate a new agreement, or cancel their agreement altogether, by 2017. As of the last 10 to 12 years, Switzerland has seen an average of 80,000 immigrants enter the country every year. Compare this with the previous range of  23,000 to 30,000 immigrants annually in the period 1972-2002. The Swiss government is looking to reduce the annual influx of foreigners by 60%.

This new policy would not be so bad, if not for implicit xenophobic motives. Switzerland's right wing party, the Swiss People's Party (SVP), has advocated for anti-immigration policies in order to preserve the Swiss identity, and to keep Switzerland "idyllic". SVP was also behind a massively racist poster campaign to discourage immigration, depicting "white sheep kicking black or yellow sheep out of the country and black crows pecking at Switzerland, like a piece of bread." Some accuse the SVP of manipulating the public and playing on implicit racial fears.

The SVP's meddling has major implications for Switzerland's relations with the European Union. The new quotas, as previously mentioned, go against the Swiss-EU agreement on the free movement of persons. This principle is key in the Bilateral Agreements I Framework between Switzerland and the EU, and because this aspect of the agreement is being violated, the EU will likely terminate the entire agreement. This bilateral agreement also sets up Switzerland's participation in EU research programs, free movement through overland transport, easier agricultural trade, as well as other free market and open border policies.

On an educational level, limiting immigration will impact student exchange. EU and Swiss students are able to move freely between states and attend universities without extra costs or visa requirements, particularly through the Erasmus program. Should agreements between the EU and the Swiss end, Swiss students will either incur the costs of studying abroad or will be limited in the higher education options available to them. In the business sphere, companies are preparing to pull out of Switzerland. The xenophobic reputation the Swiss are creating will directly impact other nations' desire to work with them. Combined with tense EU economic relations, the new immigration quotas will make Swiss-EU bilateral trade more difficult and economic development may stagnate.

It is entirely possible that the Swiss did not realize the effect these new quotas would have on Switzerland's economic and diplomatic relations. Internationally, people are beginning to see past the idyllic façade, the fancy watches, and chocolate. In an age when sensitivity to race is at an all-time high, the timing of these policies are disadvantageous. While many countries in Europe are dealing with racial tensions and immigration issues, having these problems publicized can only discourage positive public opinion. Unless the Swiss can do damage control, any hope for educational exchange, economic exchange, and general diplomatic relations with other states will be very difficult to accomplish.  

Articles used: 

No comments:

Post a Comment